Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William Snowden, Jr. v. Charmaine Bracy, Warden
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 19-3739 · judgment October 28, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
Questions for Review
-
When a habeas corpus Petitioner is innocent of an aggravated felony, has proof of innocence beyond all reasonable doubt and the conviction occurred because of ineffective assistance of counsel, should the petition be dismissed as procedurally defaulted without an evidentiary hearing?
-
When overzealous prosecutors can take an unconstitutionally vague law and convict first time offenders with aggravated felonies, should this Court reverse it’s ruling in Almendarez Torres v. United States, to prevent innocent defendants from being unlawfully convicted and sent to prison?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William Snowden Jr.
For respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers
Ashbrook Byrne Kresge Flowers LLC
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, February 24, 2020 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Feb 24 2020Petition DENIED.
- Feb 05 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
- Jan 31 2020Waiver of right of respondent Charmaine Bracy to respond filed.
- Jan 21 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2020)