Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lexington H-L Services, Inc., dba Lexington Herald Leader v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 18-5851 · judgment April 17, 2019
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and a Sixth Circuit decision below.
Question presented
The Community News is a free community newsweekly that has been distributed to homes in the Lexington, Kentucky area for several years by a traditional method of newspaper delivery, “driveway delivery,” by which news carriers throw the paper onto the driveways or yards of area homes. Residents who do not wish to receive The Community News, however, are able to opt out of delivery. In 2017, the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (“the County”) enacted an Ordinance prohibiting driveway delivery of The Community News; instead, the County requires delivery of “unsolicited” materials, including the weekly newspaper, to one of six specified locations at each residence. Pet. App. 29a. The nature of the permitted delivery locations effectively requires the newspaper to be distributed by hand delivery. The restrictions imposed by the County and approved by the decisions below place the constitutionally protected distribution of news and information in serious jeopardy. The Sixth Circuit’s approval of the Ordinance as a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction cannot be squared with the First Amendment, a longstanding body of this Court’s jurisprudence applying free speech and free press protections to the distribution of news and information, and the substantial weight of authority in state and federal courts that have considered the issue. See Martin v. City of Struthers, 319 U.S. 141 (1943) (holding that the First Amendment protects the direct distribution of written information to homeowners). The conflict of authority created by the decision below and the lingering uncertainty regarding the reasonable limits on time, place, and
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John A. Bussian III
The Bussian Law Firm, PLLC
For respondent
Keith Moorman
Frost Brown Todd, LLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by CNHI, LLC, et al. GRANTED.
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Aug 21 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Aug 16 2019Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by CNHI, LLC, et al.
- Aug 07 2019Waiver of right of respondent Lexington - Fayette Urban County Gov't to respond filed.
- Jul 16 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 16, 2019)