Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Emmanuel E. Ubinas-Brache v. Surgery Center of Texas, LP
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, No. 05-17-01334-CV · judgment December 7, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Animated by concerns over fraud and rising costs in federal healthcare reimbursement programs like Medicare and Medicaid, Congress enacted an anti-kickback statute prohibiting renumeration for patient referrals. Here, a Texas limited partnership operating a surgical center expelled one of its surgeon-limited partners for refusing to violate that statute. Applying state contract law, a Texas appellate court deemed this permissible under a provision in the partnership agreement authorizing expulsion “for any reason, or no reason.” The question presented is: 1. Does applying state contract law to enforce a partnership agreement’s clause permitting expulsion “for any reason or no reason” obstruct Congress’s efforts to control healthcare fraud, such that the anti-kickback statute preempts state law and prohibits expelling a surgeon-limited partner for refusing to violate it?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Charles E. Baruch
Johnston Tobey Baruch
For respondent
Michael S. Alfred
Hallett & Perrin, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 02 2020Petition DENIED.
- Feb 12 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
- Feb 03 2020Waiver of right of respondent Surgery Center of Texas, LP to respond filed.
- Jan 03 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 10, 2020)