Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Philippe Buhannic

Paid petition

Certiorari denied · February 24, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Whether the state appeal courts have the right based on an obvious prejudice and bias to refuse due process to a foreign pro se litigant. The denial is so obvious, persistent and omnipresent in this case, as well as the corruption, that this court must correct this quickly to have still a meaningful constitution as the rights denied to the foreign Pro se litigant are constitutional in nature: due process, right to appeal, etc.?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Philippe Buhannic

For respondent
Peter Curtis Neger
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 24 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 05 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
  3. Jan 21 2020
    Waiver of right of respondent NY Appellate Division, First Judicial Department to respond filed.
  4. Jan 15 2020
    Waiver of TradingScreen Inc., Pierre Schroeder, Piero Grandi of right to respond not accepted for filing. (January 17, 2020 -- Duplicate submission)
  5. Jan 13 2020
    Waiver of right of respondents TradingScreen Inc., Pierre Schroeder, Piero Grandi to respond filed.
  6. Dec 24 2019
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 3, 2020)