Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Paul V. Cannon v. Bank of America, National Association, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 18-1036 · judgment February 21, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Taking the allegations in Mr. Cannon’s Complaint as true, did the District Court properly dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted?
-
If a borrower’s loan has been securitized, does he no longer have the right to full disclosure regarding who receives his mortgage payments, in what amounts, and under what terms?
-
If, because of securitization, a borrower’s mortgage payments are used in ways which are foreign to the terms stated in the loan documents he executed, are those receiving his money unjustly enriched?
-
Does a borrower remain obligated to the terms and conditions stated in the loan documents if the “lender” and/or its successor(s) breached the obligations on the lender side?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Paul V. Cannon
For respondent
Christine Marianne Kingston
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Aug 14 2019Brief of respondent Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee for CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2007-9, and Specialized Loan Servicing LLC in opposition filed.
- May 22 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2019)