Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Vivian L. Rader, et vir v. Citibank, N.A., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 18-1208 · judgment March 18, 2019
Certiorari denied · October 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
- Is Colorado’s system of non-judicial foreclosure (Co. Rev. Stat. §38-38-101 (2016) in conjunction with Rule 120) unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it provides no pre-taking means for a homeowner to discover facts and/or present relevant evidence to determine if the party foreclosing on the property is the holder of the note?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David John Schmidt Madgett
MADGETT & KLEIN, PLLC
For respondent
Cynthia Dawn Lowery-Graber
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Aug 14 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Aug 07 2019Waiver of right of respondent Citibank, N.A., et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 12 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2019)