Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

William Tong, Attorney General of Connecticut v. Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 17-3481, 17-3918 · judgment July 9, 2019


Certiorari denied · March 23, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 11% cert probability (95% interval 6%–17%)

Before the decision, about 2.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Second Circuit decision below, a state or local-government petitioner, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Question presented

Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority (“Authority”) is a public instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of Connecticut created by legislation to operate Tweed-New Haven Airport (“Airport”), which is located on the border of the City of New Haven (“City”) and the Town of East Haven, Connecticut (“Town”). In 2009, the City, the Town and the Authority entered into an agreement limiting the length of a runway at the Airport to 5,600 linear feet. The agreement called for the state legislature to codify the runway length, which it did that same year by enacting Conn. Gen. Stat. § 15-120j(c) (the “Tweed-NH statute”). Six years later, the Authority and the City (collectively, “Respondents”) brought a declaratory judgment action in federal court against the State claiming that the statute was preempted by various federal laws and therefore unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause. The State filed a motion to dismiss challenging Respondents’ standing on the grounds that political subdivisions are barred from suing their creator States under the Supremacy Clause. The Second Circuit held that the Authority had standing to sue the State under the Supremacy Clause, and that Connecticut’s legislation limiting the length of the runway is preempted by the Federal Aviation Act because the statute “intrudes into the field of air safety.” The questions presented are: 1. Does a political subdivision of a State have standing to sue its creator State under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Clare E. Kindall
Office of the Attorney General

For respondent
Mark W. Mosier
Covington & Burling, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Linked docket
19A347

Proceedings

  1. Mar 23 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 27 2020
    Reply of petitioner William Tong filed.(Distributed)
  3. Feb 26 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
  4. Feb 10 2020
    Brief of respondents Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Jan 10 2020
    Response Requested. (Due February 10, 2020)
  6. Dec 30 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/17/2020.
  7. Dec 16 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent City of New Haven to respond filed.
  8. Dec 16 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority to respond filed.
  9. Dec 06 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2020)
  10. Sep 27 2019
    Application (19A347) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until December 6, 2019.
  11. Sep 24 2019
    Application (19A347) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 7, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.