Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Interior Glass Systems, Inc. v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-15713 · judgment June 26, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Is the collection of tax penalties an exception to the requirements of due process, or does a citizen have a right to a hearing before the IRS seizes thousands, or even millions, of dollars in tax penalties?
-
If the citizen has a right to a hearing, does a meeting with an IRS Appeals Officer satisfy the requirement of a “meaningful” pre-collection hearing?
-
Does the IRS’s broad interpretation of “substantially similar” render the penalty statute so vague and unpredictable that no person of “common intelligence” could anticipate what types of plans would need to be reported?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Patrick McDonnell
Law Offices of John P. McDonnell
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 09 2019Petition DENIED.
- Nov 20 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
- Nov 12 2019Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Oct 30 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)