Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Donald Dewees v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 17-5274 · judgment April 9, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
The Convention between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital (“the Convention”) allows no meaningful review prior to the assessment and collection of a non-resident U.S. citizen’s tax liability. The Petitioner Donald Dewees, a Canadian resident, was forced to pay his contested U.S. tax debt due to Canadian withholding and collection activity pursuant to Article 26A of the Convention. Also, while the D.C. Circuit Court below acknowledged that Dewees has standing to claim an equal protection violation, it upheld the IRS’ refusal to allow him enter its Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures (SFCP). Lack of access to the SFCP arbitrarily cost Dewees $120,000 in assessed maximum tax penalties for late filings of Form 5471, even where the IRS admitted Dewees’ owed no tax. Therefore, the Questions Presented are:
-
Did the lack of a meaningful review of the assessment and collection of a tax under the Convention violate Dewees’ right to due process?
-
Did the IRS’ arbitrary refusal to allow Dewees’ to enter the SFCP violate his equal protection rights, where other non-resident taxpayers allowed into the program avoid late-filing penalties?
-
Were the civil fines assessed and collected against Dewees for late filings of Form 5471 excessive under the Eighth Amendment, especially where the IRS acknowledged Dewees owed no tax?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mark Allan Feigenbaum
Attorney At Law
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jul 31 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 26 2019Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jul 05 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2019)