Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Keith A. Tucker, et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 17-60833 · judgment April 3, 2019
Before the decision, about 7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Fifth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
May the judge-made “economic substance doctrine” be invoked to supplant any tax results that a court deems abusive, even when those results stem from the application of clear, unambiguous, and mechanical provisions of tax law, as the Fifth Circuit held below and other courts of appeals have concluded, or is the doctrine properly invoked only as a tool for interpreting the meaning of tax laws, as the D.C. and Sixth Circuits have held?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gregory George Garre
Latham & Watkins LLP
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2019Petition DENIED.
- Sep 18 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
- Sep 18 2019Reply of petitioner Keith A. Tucker; Laura B. Tucker filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 04 2019Brief of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue in opposition filed.
- Aug 01 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 4, 2019.
- Jul 31 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2019 to September 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jul 02 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2019)