Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

New York Republican State Committee v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 18-1111 · judgment June 18, 2019


Certiorari denied · January 13, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 22% cert probability (95% interval 15%–32%)

Before the decision, about 5.4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, counsel with five or more prior petitions here, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Questions presented

On August 25, 2016, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter “Respondent” or “Commission” or “SEC”) approved Rule 2030, reproduced here as Appendix H (also, the “Rule”). Rule 2030 regulates the political contributions of those members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) who act as “placement agents.” Rule 2030 prohibits a placement agent from accepting compensation for soliciting government business from certain candidates and elected officials within two years of having contributed to such an official’s electoral campaign or to the transition or inaugural expenses of a successful candidate. Rule 2030’s prohibitions raise the following constitutional and Administrative Procedure Act questions:

  1. Whether Rule 2030 violates the First Amendment by (a) imposing different contribution limits on candidates running for the same office, and/or (b) restricting otherwise lawful political activity despite the SEC’s failure to identify one instance where a lawful political contribution alone led to quid pro quo corruption.

  2. Whether the SEC has the authority to impose restrictions by regulation on the First Amendment rights of placement agents to make or solicit federal political contributions that are otherwise lawful under the Federal Election Campaign Act.

  3. Whether Rule 2030 is arbitrary and capricious because it restricts otherwise lawful political activity despite the SEC’s failure to identify one instance where a lawful political contribution alone led to fraudulent or manipulative practices. (i)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jason Brett Torchinsky
Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky Josefiak PLLC

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 13 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 23 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
  3. Dec 19 2019
    Reply of petitioner New York Republican State Committee filed.
  4. Dec 06 2019
    Brief of respondent Securities and Exchange Commission in opposition filed.
  5. Nov 12 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 6, 2019.
  6. Nov 08 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Oct 09 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2019.
  8. Oct 08 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 17, 2019 to November 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Sep 16 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2019)