Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Kenneth Daniels v. United States

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 17-3503 · judgment February 7, 2019


Certiorari denied · March 2, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 11% cert probability (95% interval 7%–17%)

Before the decision, about 2.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Third Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Question presented

The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) makes it a crime to “distribute * * * a controlled substance.” 21 U.S.C. 841(a). The Act includes an “attempt” to distribute within the meaning of “distribute” (21 U.S.C. 802(8), (11)) and separately criminalizes “attempts” (21 U.S.C. 846). There is a deep and acknowledged conflict among the courts of appeals on the question whether solicitation—that is, a mere offer to buy or sell a controlled substance—can by itself constitute an “attempt” within the meaning of that language. The disagreement is impeding the uniform administration not only of the Controlled Substances Act, but also of other statutes that depend on the CSA’s proscriptions. The question whether solicitation constitutes an attempt under the CSA dictates, for example, whether a state drug offense that criminalizes solicitation categorically qualifies as a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. 924(e)(2)(a)(ii). The same holds true for the determination under the Immigration and Nationality Act whether a state drug offense categorically qualifies as an “aggravated felony.” 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(B). The outcome of this case, which involves a criminal prosecution under the ACCA, turns cleanly on the answer to the question presented. The question presented is whether solicitation can by itself constitute an “attempt” within the meaning of the Controlled Substances Act.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Michael B. Kimberly
McDermott Will & Emery LLP

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Linked docket
18A996

Proceedings

  1. Mar 02 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Feb 26 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
  3. Sep 18 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
  4. Sep 03 2019
    Brief of respondent United States filed.
  5. Jul 31 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 3, 2019.
  6. Jul 30 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 1, 2019 to September 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Jul 01 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 1, 2019)
  8. Apr 01 2019
    Application (18A996) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 7, 2019.
  9. Mar 29 2019
    Application (18A996) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 8, 2019 to July 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.