Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jeanetta Springer, et vir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 18-14324 · judgment August 26, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
If you demand a trial by jury and pay the fees to the Court for it, can the court force you (as a pro se) to a bench trial to cover up Color of Law Abuses?
-
Should a Federal Judge recuse himself or herself when it can be proven that he or she withheld information as part of an ongoing conspiracy?
-
Should a Judge recuse himself or herself from a case where bias is (or appears to be) present on the part of the Judge where his or her conduct in the first case could only be considered as shock the conscience?
-
Should two state-court decisions be inextricably in tertwined where this foreclosure was initiated in the same court as the ongoing conspiracy?
-
Should the United States District Courts use RookerFeldman Doctrine when case precedence for the decisions rendered by the State Courts were nullities and the State itself waived judicial immunity of the judge?
-
If the state waived the immunity of the judicial of ficer because of willful misconduct, why should that judge's order still be good, in which the decision violates petition ers’ rights to due process?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
T. Jeanetta Springer
For respondent
Meghan S. Cole
Sirote & Permutt, PC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 29 2020Petition DENIED.
- Jun 09 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
- Jun 05 2020Waiver of right of respondent Sirote & Permutt, P.C. to respond filed.
- May 26 2020Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
- Apr 22 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2020)