Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kenneth Miller v. Robert Ferguson, Attorney General of Washington
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-35032 · judgment April 26, 2019
Before the decision, about 2.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
Is the following question one that jurists of reason would find debatable? Does the total prohibition on the exercise of a person’s fundamental Second Amendment right to keep a firearm in one’s home for purposes of self-defense constitute the type of “severe restraint on liberty” described in Hensley v. Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345, 351 (1973) which satisfies the habeas corpus custody requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Elliot Lobsenz
Carney Badley Spellman, P.S.
For respondent
Anne Elizabeth Egeler
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 31 2019Waiver of right of respondent Robert Ferguson to respond filed.
- Jul 23 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)