Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

James W. Smith v. United States

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 17-4083, 17-4093, 18-4036 · judgment March 29, 2019


Certiorari denied · October 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. The Meaning of “Shall” in the Internal Revenue Code. Sections 6501(a), 6213(a), and 6901(a) of the Internal Revenue Code all provide that the Government “shall” or “shall not” take certain actions in connection with providing notice, making assessments, and collecting unpaid taxes, and § 6502(a) uses an equivalent phrase (“but only if”). Does the use of the word “shall” in the identified code sections make their provisions mandatory with respect to notice, assessment, payment, and collection in the case of transferees, or can the Government bring proceedings in court to collect taxes without complying with these provisions?

  2. The Overall Statutory Scheme. The Internal Revenue Code has a very detailed framework of interrelated code sections dealing with a wide range of procedural and administrative issues, including provisions governing notice, assessment, payment, and collection of taxes. Can the Government substitute a judiciallycreated alternative for the very detailed statutory scheme designed by Congress for purposes of enforcing transferee liability?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David Edward Sloan
Fabian Vancott

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 24 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
  3. Jul 15 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
  4. Jun 27 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2019)