Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sandra Waite, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Waite, Jr. v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 16-15569 · judgment August 23, 2018
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eleventh Circuit decision below, and a petition citing one or two dissents, and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
I. Whether the circuit court erred when it ignored the three-prong analysis the Court has repeatedly set forth for analyzing specific jurisdiction and, instead, applied a single-factor, plaintiff-specific in-state causation test to this asbestos products liability case. II. Whether the circuit court erred in applying its in-state causation test when it defined the legal “injury” in this case not as Mr. Waite’s mesothelioma, but rather as his initial inhalation of asbestos. III. Whether, in return for granting the right to conduct intrastate business in the forum, a state may require a foreign corporation register for that right and consent to general jurisdiction in the forum.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jonathan Ruckdeschel
The Ruckdeschel Law Firm
For respondent
Matthew John Conigliaro
Carlton Fields, P.A.
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, March 25, 2019 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Mar 25 2019Petition DENIED.
- Mar 06 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
- Feb 26 2019Waiver of right of respondent Union Carbide Corporation to respond filed.
- Jan 29 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)