Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Robert Lee Rhoe, II v. Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement

Paid petition · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, No. 848, September Term, 2016 · judgment May 9, 2018


Certiorari denied · February 19, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Enma Quispe Perez (hereinafter Custodial Parent) pointed Montgomery County Maryland Office of Child Support Enforcement (hereinafter referred to as MCOCSE) to Robert L. Rhoe, II, (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) alleging him to be the father of a child as a condition for financial assistance. Both MCOCSE and the Custodial Parent have significant vested interests of child support and U. S. citizenship over the Life, Liberty, Property, and extended-life potential earnings from Petitioner's deoxyribonucleic acid (hereinafter referred to as DNA) as a result of economically enslaving him, Amendment XIII, U.S. Constitution (Page v, Table of Authorities). Does MCOCSE and the Maryland Courts have jurisdiction and legal authority to intervene on behalf of a foreign person illegally present in the United States; to join, and to litigate Petitioner, who is a natural born citizen, in violation of the U.S. Constitution, Petitioner's constitutional rights, and established law? Is the state's exceptional taking of DNA in the criminal law (Table of Authorities, Page iv, Maryland v. King, 569 U. S. 435 (2013)) expanding and becoming routine in the practice of civil law?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert Lee Rhoe II

For respondent
Julia Doyle

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 19 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 23 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
  3. Jan 16 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement to respond filed.
  4. Nov 28 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)