Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Robert Stephen Couturier v. Presiding Judge, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-56376 · judgment May 7, 2018


Certiorari denied · February 19, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals error when it denied The Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability? Is a Defendant denied the right to a fair trial and impartial jury under Federal Law and The United States Constitution and Amendments, when his or her bench trial is conducted before and she or he is convicted by the very same judge that signed the Arrest Warrant that involves the matter at hand? Is it reasonable to logically deduce that reasonable people or fair minded jury people that know all of the facts would believe that a judge would follow legal procedure and would read a police report that supports the probable cause necessary to issue an arrest warrant? Is a defendant denied his Fourteenth Amendment Right to a fair trial when the judge tells the defendant during a pre-trial hearing that she does not know the facts of the current case and it turns out that this same

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert Stephen Couturier

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Feb 19 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 23 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
  3. Sep 22 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 11, 2019)