Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Danica Zovko, et al. v. National Credit Union Administration Board
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 17-3716, 17-3750 · judgment April 11, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict rendered in the Northern District of Ohio. Three questions are presented:
-
Does this Court’s holding in D’Oench, Duhme & Co., Inc. v. FDIC permit the NCUAB to ignore proper evidence, statutes of limitations, affirmative defenses, and federal law?
-
Does the D’Oench, Duhme Doctrine permit the NCUA and its liquidating agent, the NCUAB, to use forged paperwork created by the individual who masterminded the largest credit union theft in United States history and then use him to verify the paper as against innocent depositors?
-
Does 12 U.S.C. § 1787(p)(2) permit the NCUAB to claim reliance upon the “official written agreements” in the credit union’s books and records when they know those books and records deceived the NCUA, outside auditors and the Credit Union Board for years?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael P. Harvey
Michael P. Harvey Co., L.P.A.
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 25 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jul 23 2018Waiver of right of respondent National Credit Union Administration Board to respond filed.
- Jul 23 2018Notice of notification under Rule 12.3 filed.
- Jul 10 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 13, 2018)