Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Norman Bloom v. Aftermath Public Adjusters, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 17-41087 · judgment September 4, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
This Court holds that when a state has adopted procedures for certification of state law questions, a federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction should certify dispositive state law questions when the state law is not clear or is nonexistent and the issue is significant to the state. There is a dramatic split among the circuits as to what standards they should apply when exercising their discretion to certify a state law question with some circuits focusing on the state certification rules and the others not. The result is that some circuits have a much lower percent of state law questions being certified than other circuits. With the forgoing in mind, the question presented in this petition is: Whether the language of a state’s certification rule should factor into the federal court’s decision to certify a dispositive state law question in a diversity case when state law is not clear or is nonexistent on an issue significant to the state.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Timothy A. Hootman
Hootman & Company
For respondent
Joshua Nelson-Archer
Rymer, Echols, Slay, Wilkerson, Nelson-Archer, P.C
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 19 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jan 16 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
- Jan 09 2019Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.
- Jan 08 2019Respondents Statement Aftermath Public Adjusters, Inc., et al., Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement received.
- Jan 07 2019Brief of respondents Aftermath Public Adjusters, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
- Nov 29 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 7, 2019)