Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Pamela Denise Idlett

Paid petition


Certiorari denied · January 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Rule 14.1(a) and Rule 24 28 U.S.C. §1331, Federal Question Preface All judges for the United States (U.S.) possess legally binding declaratory oaths and code of conduct clauses to abide by in support of the U.S. Constitution. Marbury v. Madison (1803). Whether the Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge (AU) gives verbal acknowledgement in his federal hearing to a known disability determination by another federal agency? Whether the ALJ conduct consists of "willingly" omitting "known" material facts from the petitioner's federal record [Office of Personnel Management (OPM's) Disability Retirement" (July 31, 2012)] in his conclusion of law which were

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Pamela Denise Idlett

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 17 2018
    Supplemental Appendix of petitioner filed. (Distributed)
  3. Dec 08 2018
    Supplemental Appendix of petitioner filed. (Distributed)
  4. Nov 28 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
  5. Nov 15 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent to respond filed.
  6. Oct 11 2018
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due November 15, 2018)