Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
D. A. v. D. P., II
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District, No. 20A03-1705-PO-966 · judgment February 28, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Questions
-
Did the Indiana Court of Appeals decision in this matter conflict with the due process standard which was declared in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868, 876 (2009)?
-
Are the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment violated when a magistrate issues a ruling while working under a judge who was counsel of record for a party during the trial, although the magistrate is also working under other judges as well?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Lawrence Joley
Joley Law Firm PC
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Dec 14 2018Waiver of D. A. of right to respond not accepted for filing. (December 19, 2018)
- Nov 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Aug 14 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 15, 2018)