Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Carl M. Burnett v. Panasonic Corporation, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1234 · judgment July 16, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether electronic data is the tangible embodiment of an electromagnetic analog or digital signal and when changed to a new and useful form of electronic data remains a tangible embodiment of an electromagnetic analog or digital signal and is therefore directed to patent-eligible subject matter within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101 as interpreted by this Court. Whether a process that creates a new and useful tangible embodiment of electronic data is therefore directed to patent-eligible subject matter within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101 as interpreted by this Court.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Carl M. Burnett
For respondent
Benjamin Michael Daniels
Wiggin and Dana LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 03 2018Petition DENIED.
- Nov 07 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
- Oct 30 2018Waiver of right of respondents Panasonic Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
- Sep 18 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 1, 2018)