Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Zachary N. Trost, et ux. v. Sherry Trost
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 17-1877 · judgment May 30, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
I. For a debt arising out of unlawful conduct to be considered non-dischargeable in bankruptcy pursuant to Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 523 U.S. 57 (1998), what should constitute sufficient evidence that a wrongdoer intended the consequences of the wrongful act and not merely the wrongful act itself? II. What party should bear the burden of proving that a wrongdoer intended the ‘the consequences of the wrongful act’ and not merely the wrongful act itself, for a debt associated with the wrongdoing to be non dischargeable in bankruptcy?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Robert Behan
Behan & Przybylo
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jan 07 2019Rehearing DENIED.
- Dec 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Nov 30 2018Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Nov 05 2018Petition DENIED.
- Oct 17 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
- Aug 28 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2018)