Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mary L. Doherty, et al. v. Allstate Indemnity Company
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 17-1860 · judgment May 25, 2018
Before the decision, about 1.9× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Third Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
Whether the affirmed Rule 56 summary judgment decision is inconsistent with the standard set forth in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986), and violative of the “Mend-the-Hold” Doctrine in Railway v. McCarthy, 96 U.S. 258 (1878), as the court relied upon inadmissible hearsay and simultaneously precluded relevant, material evidence of the insureds’ Expert Witness Reports thereby depriving them of their rights to Due Process and a Jury Trial under the Fifth and Seventh Amendments.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph Quinto Mirarchi
Mirarchi Legal Services, P.C.
For respondent
Brian James Madden
Donnelly & Associates, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 03 2018Petition DENIED.
- Nov 07 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
- Nov 05 2018Reply of petitioners Mary L. Doherty, et al. filed.
- Oct 24 2018Brief of respondent Allstate Indemnity Company in opposition filed.
- Sep 24 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 26, 2018.
- Sep 19 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 26, 2018 to October 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 29 2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Mary L. Doherty, et al.
- Aug 23 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 26, 2018)