Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Zsolt Petko, et al. v. Carelton Courtyard
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Texas, No. 18-0860 · judgment January 18, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Case No: 16-TOW03-0097 Court: Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3, Galveston County, Texas Judge: Penny Pope Date: November 8, 2016 Question l: Does towing a person’s car constitute a legal action (TOC Sec. 2308.001)? Question 2- Does a person subjected to a legal action (i.e. towing) has the burden of proof to prove innocence or burden of proof rests with the one who initiated legal action (i.e. tower)? Question 3: Can a justice of the peace overlook factual evidence that unequivocally proves case in favor of plaintiff and claim existence of probable cause to justify ruling in favor of defendant (TRCP Rule 1 in Appendix N)? Question 4- Can a justice of the peace preclude plaintiff from the opportunity to prepare a response by allowing defendant to modify testimony and introduce new evidence at the hearing without notifying plaintiff ahead of time before the hearing (US Constitution Amendments V, VIII, and XIV in Appendix N)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Zsolt Petko
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Dec 16 2019Rehearing DENIED.
- Nov 26 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
- Nov 01 2019Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Apr 18 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 25, 2019)