Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Velma Brooks v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Colorado, No. 18CA0273 · judgment October 25, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Colorado refuse to seek the truth in my case, by overlooking the evident and documents presented to them. This case was consisted with numerous of errs by the state law. There where falsify, contradicting, misleading and conspiracy in this case. “If the lower court had presented the truth, in the beginning of this case it wouldn’t had went this far in court. The ICOA stated the ALJ err in his report and misapplied the burden of prove in his application. The Court Appeals overlooked the evident also. And the Colorado Supreme Court denied the case.
-
Why did it take eight days after my injuries, before seem by a worker’s comp, doctor? By the state law that’s a errs.
-
How long does it take to validate the true in a case?
-
How long a person should suffer before justice is done?
-
How can anyone falsify information on a legal document and the judges let it pass thought the court system?
-
Was there enough conspiracy noticed in this case?
-
Was there enough evident weigh to be proven?
-
Do you feel there’s no justification for rights?
-
Did the surgeon doctor provide enough evident in his report to prove these injuries did occur from the fall at work?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Velma Brooks
For respondent
T. Paul Krueger II
Ritsema & Lyon, PC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jul 31 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 16 2019Waiver of right of respondent Aurora Public Schools to respond filed.
- Jul 15 2019Waiver of right of respondent Industrial Claim Appeals Office to respond filed.
- Mar 22 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)