Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Scott A. Boyler v. City of Lackawanna, New York, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 18-839 · judgment March 13, 2019
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Second Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and counsel who has filed here before, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Questions presented
-
Did the Second Circuit err in adopting a subjective test for whether retaliation chilled free speech, contrary to at least six other Circuits that use an objective test.
-
Did the Second Circuit err in holding that the plaintiff could be arrested for posting pure political speech on social media?
-
Did the trial court err in holding that the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity as it was not clearly established that a citizen could not be arrested for posting pure political speech on Facebook?
-
Did the trial court err in holding that a website post can constitute aggravated harassment under New York law?
-
Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment to the defendants?
-
Did the trial court err in holding that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment with respect to the malicious prosecution causes of action?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Kuzma
Michael Kuzma
For respondent
Julie P. Apter
Goldberg Segalla
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jul 17 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jun 24 2019Waiver of right of respondents City of Lackawanna, Joseph Leo and Brian Lakso to respond filed.
- Jun 10 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)