Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. v. Shawn Jensen, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 16-17282, 17-15352, 17-15302 · judgment December 20, 2018
Before the decision, about 2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Questions presented
-
Did the Ninth Circuit—in direct conflict with the Seventh Circuit—erroneously fail to recognize that 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) precludes the parties from selecting a particular magistrate judge to preside over their conflict and that, when they do so, the magistrate judge does not obtain jurisdiction over the matter?
-
Did the Ninth Circuit—contrary to the text of 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(1)(A), the purpose of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, and decisions of this Court and other circuit courts—err in holding that a court can order prospective relief in a civil action relating to prison conditions without first finding that the defendant actually violated the prisoner’s federal rights?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nicholas D. Acedo
Struck Love Bojanowski & Acedo, PLC
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jul 31 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jun 12 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)