Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hallmark Care Services, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of Washington, Spokane County
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, No. 33356-6-III · judgment October 18, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
The Superior Court of Washington for Spokane County, initiated, sua sponte, and selfprosecuted an action against the Petitioners, who are professional guardians. The local court commenced the action, without notice or hearing, by sending ex parte directives to multiple parties, and by entering ex parte orders. Pursuant to these orders, the local court held scores of expedited “drumhead” hearings, at which 124 clients of the professional guardians were "transitioned" to competing businesses; prior to which the Petitioners had no opportunity to review the unadjudicated allegations made against them; and, during which the Petitioners had no reasonable opportunity to defend against the allegations. Petitioners submit these questions for review:
-
Whether a courtappointed professional guardian has a property interest in the business expectation of continued fees, and a predeprivation right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment before being removed from that appointment;
-
Whether a State Court can, sua sponte, initiate and prosecute an action against a party, and then deny appellate review of whether the State action deprived the party of her due process rights.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John William Pierce
Law Office of John Pierce. P.S.
For respondent
Steven Kinn
Spokane County Prosecutor's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jul 31 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 02 2019Waiver of right of respondents Amanda Witthauer, et al. to respond filed.
- Jun 11 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)