Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Hallmark Care Services, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of Washington, Spokane County

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, No. 33356-6-III · judgment October 18, 2018


Certiorari denied · October 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

The Superior Court of Washington for Spokane County, initiated, sua sponte, and self­prosecuted an action against the Petitioners, who are professional guardians. The local court commenced the action, without notice or hearing, by sending ex parte directives to multiple parties, and by entering ex parte orders. Pursuant to these orders, the local court held scores of expedited “drumhead” hearings, at which 124 clients of the professional guardians were "transitioned" to competing businesses; prior to which the Petitioners had no opportunity to review the unadjudicated allegations made against them; and, during which the Petitioners had no reasonable opportunity to defend against the allegations. Petitioners submit these questions for review:

  1. Whether a court­appointed professional guardian has a property interest in the business expectation of continued fees, and a pre­deprivation right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment before being removed from that appointment;

  2. Whether a State Court can, sua sponte, initiate and prosecute an action against a party, and then deny appellate review of whether the State action deprived the party of her due process rights.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
John William Pierce
Law Office of John Pierce. P.S.

For respondent
Steven Kinn
Spokane County Prosecutor's Office

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 31 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
  3. Jul 02 2019
    Waiver of right of respondents Amanda Witthauer, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Jun 11 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)