Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Naren Chaganti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 17-3804 · judgment December 14, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether stipulations filed under Tax Court Rule 91(a) & (e) are binding on the parties and the Tax Court.
-
Whether statements in a court order in one case may be used for their truth in a different case over a hearsay objection.
-
Whether litigation sanctions ordered by a district court and paid to an opposing party are “fines” or “penalties” “paid to a government” under Internal Revenue Code § 162(f) (2006), in light of the change to the code section enacted in the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Naren Chaganti
Law Offices of Naren Chaganti
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 17 2019Petition DENIED.
- May 28 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
- May 22 2019Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed.
- May 10 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 13, 2019)