Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Anica Ashbourne v. Donna Hansberry, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 17-5136 · judgment June 29, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Upon exhaustion of the administrative proceedings, the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-16(c), section 7 17(c) provides a federal sector employee with an unconditional right to a trial de novo for discrimination claims filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Chandler v. Roudebush, 425 U.S. 840, (1976); President v. Vance, 627 F.2d 353, 360 (D.C. Cir. 1980). Upon exhaustion of the administrative proceedings, did 42 U.S.C. §2000e-16(c) provide Anica Ashbourne with an unconditional right to a trial de novo on her discrimination claims flied pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Did the courts abuse their judicial authority when they ignored Brown v. Gen 7 Services Adm., 425 U.S. 820 (1976) and Chandler v. Roudebush, 425 U.S. 840 (1976), by relying on 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5 to dismiss a complaint that was filed under 42 U.S.C. §2000e-16?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Anica Ashbourne
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Jun 19 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- May 14 2019Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Feb 02 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 7, 2019)
- Nov 27 2018Application (18A547) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 2, 2019.
- Nov 25 2018Application (18A547) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 4, 2018 to February 2, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.