Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
John M. Barone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 18-11272 · judgment December 10, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The third request of this Court to rectify numerous wrongs committed by Wells Fargo and assisted by and/or ignored by Courts against petitioner, his family and millions of unsuspecting homeowners. With clear direction to prevent manifest injustice, there is no excuse for failures engulfing the justice system for over a decade in favor of habitual wrongdoer Wells Fargo violating millions of Americans Constitutional rights. The government Totally Controls Fannie Mae, financially benefiting from millions of wrongful foreclosures. Treasury documents show Fannie as "financial agent for the government", and de-facto State-actor. This mass wrongful taking of Constitutionally protected properties is unlawful, immoral, inhumane, and has led to record poverty and homelessness. Along with spikes in anxiety, depression, PTSD and suicides. Wells Fargo and others commit mass Fraud on the Courts with lack of standing, wrong venue and fabricated documents for unjust judgements. Unlawful MBS securitization and rehypothecation forced millions into default through modification and foreclosure fraud, and many into bankruptcy. All while Wells Fargo and accomplices collected monies well in excess of the mortgage notes utilizing the properties without disclosure, consent, authority or applying the monies to the note balances. Wells Fargo and Fannie are not Legal Owners and had no right to "sell" and/or "pledge" the homeowners rights under NEMO DAT QUOD NON HABET. This case raises vital issues of federal jurisdiction of federal RICO claims and de facto State-actors. It raises questions over Constitutional property rights, fraudulent seizure, securities laws over undisclosed mortgage securitization (RMBS), rehypothecation, default derivatives and foreclosure and modification fraud. It raises Constitutional questions of Due Process and treatment of Pro Se parties. Thus, the questions presented are:
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Barone
For respondent
Robert William Loftin
McGuireWoods LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Aug 23 2019Rehearing DENIED.
- Aug 01 2019DISTRIBUTED.
- Jul 10 2019Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jun 17 2019Petition DENIED.
- May 28 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
- May 14 2019Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
- Mar 05 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)