Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Charmaine Clement v. Thomas Durban, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of New York, No. 118 · judgment November 14, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Privileges and Immunities Clause, U.S. Const. art. IV, § 2, cl. 1, guarantees the right of U.S. citizens to access the courts of each of the 50 States, regardless of state residency. N.Y. CPLR Article 85 (N.Y. CPLR §§ 8501-8503) imposes on plaintiffs who are not residents of New York the burden of posting security for costs as a condition precedent to their access to the state courts. It articulates no reason for imposing that requirement and none is apparent. The question presented is: Whether Article 85 is consistent with the Privileges and Immunities Clause despite its discrimination against nonresidents of New York and the material burden it creates on their access to New York’s courts.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert J. Tolchin
The Berkman Law Office, LLC
For respondent
MacKenzie Fillow
Corporation Counsel's Office
Proceedings
- May 28 2019Petition DENIED.
- May 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
- Apr 25 2019Waiver of right of respondent Thomas Durban, et al. to respond filed.
- Apr 12 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 16, 2019)
- Feb 06 2019Application (18A803) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until April 15, 2019.
- Jan 31 2019Application (18A803) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 12, 2019 to April 13, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.