Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Timothy O'Neill v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 18-1382 · judgment November 19, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
QUESTION 1 Did the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for. - the SIXTH CIRCUIT wrongfully and grievously apply the doctrine of STARE DECISIS:in upholding the decision of Magistrate Judge Ellen Carmody in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN (1:16-cv-01061). QUESTION2: Did. the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the SIXTH CIRCUIT wrongfully apply Hoover v; Provident 290 F.3d when deciding. the plan administrator correctly interpreted the plan in denying O'Neill LTD benefits. J I -
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Timothy O'Neill
For respondent
D. Andrew Portinga
Miller Johnson
Case
Subject area
Economic Activity (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, May 28, 2019 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- May 28 2019Petition DENIED.
- May 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
- Apr 25 2019Waiver of right of respondent Unum Life Insurance Company of America to respond filed.
- Apr 09 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 16, 2019)