Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Andrew Levert v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 18-10620 · judgment March 21, 2019
Before the decision, about 4.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a petition filed soon after the judgment below, counsel who has won certiorari before, and an Eleventh Circuit decision below.
Question presented
Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant pursuing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is entitled to relief under a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory provision, where the record is silent as to whether the district court based its original judgment on that provision or another provision of the same statute.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey L. Fisher
Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences
Proceedings
- Oct 15 2019Petition DENIED.
- Oct 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
- Jul 24 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 24 2019Reply of petitioner Andrew Levert filed. (Distributed)
- Jul 05 2019Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- May 31 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 5, 2019.
- May 29 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 5, 2019 to July 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- May 06 2019Response Requested. (Due June 5, 2019)
- Apr 30 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
- Apr 18 2019Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Apr 05 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 8, 2019)