Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Brian Mark Burmaster v. Switzerland
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 18-2868 · judgment January 29, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The primary federal question that I ask is: Since the inception of the United States Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Jay, there has never been a Writ of Certiorari where the respondent fails to appoint counsel and the defendant's peaceful legal proceedings goes uncontested, unanswered and unchallenged by ignoring the seven prior attempts to contact their worldwide embassies and their extradition office, isn't this an admission of Switzerland's guilt in the heinous and despicable international act of a chemical weapon attack on a citizen of the USA (18 U.S.C. § 229 Section C3), where there are no previous cases and shouldn't the United States Supreme Court punish this unacceptable act of international terrorism by enforcing the paltry lien of US$440 million (tax-free) for the plaintiff-victim and US$330 million for American Federal Taxes on Swiss Assets here in the United States?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brian Mark Burmaster
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 03 2019Petition DENIED.
- May 14 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
- Mar 26 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)