Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Citizens for Fair Representation, et al.

Paid petition


Certiorari denied · October 1, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. In a case challenging the constitutionality of the apportionment of legislative districts, may a district judge, sitting alone, decide a motion to dismiss for lack of standing or, rather, does this Court’s unanimous opinion in Shapiro v. McManus, 136 S. Ct. 450 (2015), require that that motion be decided by a three-judge district court convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2284(a)?

  2. May the Chief Circuit Judge interfere with a district judge’s exercise of responsibility pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2284(b)(1) by instructing the district judge to withdraw the notice issued pursuant to that section and decide the motion to dismiss as a single-judge district court?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Scott Erik Stafne
Stafne Law Advocacy and Consulting

For respondent
George Waters
Attorney General's Office/Department of Justice

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 01 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Aug 22 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
  3. Aug 08 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent Alex Padilla to respond filed.
  4. Jul 10 2018
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)