Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
John E. Reardon v. Daniel B. Zonies, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 17-3551 · judgment April 11, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Question/Issue for Review Does Heck v Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 1994 apply to a case where (A) the Court in question lacked, lost or usurped its jurisdiction; (B) Where there is an ongoing or continuous tort or wrong that has been going on for 115 years; (C) where there is a fraud that has been going on for 115 years; (D) Where there has been a Constitutional challenge to the state's laws seeking injunctive and declaratory relief; (B) where this is not an imprisoned or Habeas Corpus claim and (F) where the full faith and credit clause of Article 4 is not in effect for Issues
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John E. Reardon
For respondent
Matthew Blake Wieliczko
Zeller & Wieliczko, LL P
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 09 2018Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Sep 12 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
- Aug 31 2018Reply of petitioner John E. Reardon filed.
- Aug 24 2018Brief of respondents Daniel B. Zonies, et al. in opposition filed.
- May 18 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)