Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kim Kerrigan v. Qualstar Credit Union, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-35174 · judgment June 29, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
When the standing of a removing defendant is challenged in the Court of Appeals must that Court directly address such standing challenge pursuant to its independent and sua sponte duty to establish that the presumption against lower federal courts subject matter jurisdiction has been rebutted? Is the presumption against subject matter jurisdiction of federal courts rebutted by Washington procedural law?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Scott Erik Stafne
Stafne Law Advocacy and Consulting
For respondent
Joseph W. McIntosh
McCarthy & Hothus, LLP
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Linked docket
18A674
Order
Order list, April 29, 2019 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Apr 29 2019Petition DENIED.
- Apr 19 2019Certificate of Word Count and Proof of Service filed with respect to supplemental brief of Kim C. Kerrigan.
- Apr 10 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
- Apr 09 2019Supplemental brief of petitioner Kim C. Kerrigan filed. (Distributed) (To Be Recovered)
- Mar 29 2019Waiver of right of respondent Bayview to respond filed.
- Mar 14 2019Waiver of right of respondent Qualstar to respond filed.
- Jan 14 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2019)
- Dec 27 2018Application (18A674) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 14, 2019.
- Dec 22 2018Application (18A674) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 2, 2019 to January 14, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.