Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Afoluso Adesanya, et vir v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 17-2368 · judgment October 11, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court erred in upholding the decision of Federal District Court to dismiss Petitioner One employment discrimination Lawsuit as a sanction, without any prior court finding or warning of discovery violation or disobedience to a discovery order against petitioner. Whether the 3rd Circuit Appeals Court erred in upholding the Federal District Court's engagement in unlawful Ex-parte communications with respondent, in violation of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, to the disadvantage and detriment of petitioners. In the Interest of Justice; are Pro Se litiganth' rights in the law for self-representation in US courts just for window dressing while attorneys get a free pass in instances when the opponents are Pro Se?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Afoluso Adesanya
For respondent
Robert E. Bartkus
McCusker, Anselmi, Rosen & Carvelli, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 15 2019Petition DENIED.
- Mar 27 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
- Mar 15 2019Waiver of right of respondent Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. to respond filed.
- Mar 08 2019Letter of March 6, 2019 from counsel for respondent received.
- Feb 12 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)