Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
David Duncan v. GEICO General Insurance Company
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 17-14995 · judgment May 1, 2018
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eleventh Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
Whether federal courts are wrongfully developing and applying federal case law in derogation of the U.S. Constitution and the established U.S. Supreme Court precedent of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Karl Frederick Pansler
The Pansler Law Firm, PA
For respondent
B. Richard Young
Young, Bill, Boles, Palmer & Duke, P.A.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 09 2018Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Oct 01 2018Supplemental brief of petitioner David Duncan filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 12 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
- Aug 23 2018Brief of respondent GEICO General Insurance Company in opposition filed.
- Jul 20 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 23, 2018)