Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Casey Brandon Sibley v. Arizona
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, No. 1 CA-CR 17-0768 · judgment May 31, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Casey Brandon Sibley was charged and convicted of threatening or intimidating pursuant to ARIZ.REV.STAT. § 13-1202(A)(1). Under ARIZ.REV.STAT. §13-1202(A)(1) [a] person commits threatening or intimidating if the person threatens or intimidates by word or conduct: 1. To cause physical injury to another person or serious damage to the property of another The prior version of ARIZ.REV.STAT. § 13-1202(A)(1) provided that a person commits threatening or intimidating if such person with the intent to terrify threatens or intimidates by word or conduct ... [t]o cause physical injury to another person or serious damage to property of another. 1978 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch. 201, § 128 (emphasis added). In 1994, the legislature amended ARIZ.REV.STAT. § 13–1202(A) by deleting the phrase “with the intent to terrify.” 1994 Ariz. Sess. Laws, ch. 200, § 11. Consequently, since the effective date of the 1994 amendment, a person commits threatening or intimidating without proof of the speaker’s subjective wrongful intent.1 1 Nor can a subjective wrongful intent element be read into the statute due to the Arizona Legislatures removal of such
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Douglas Wilenchik
Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C.
For respondent
Seth Peterson
City of Scottsdale Prosecution Division
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 18 2019Petition DENIED.
- Feb 27 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
- Feb 05 2019Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.
- Jan 28 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)