Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joseph Lombardo v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 15-2860 · judgment June 20, 2017
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below, and a petition citing one or two dissents.
Questions presented
-
Can egregious attorney misconduct other than abandonment ever constitute an “extraordinary circumstance” under the equitable-tolling doctrine?
-
Joseph Lombardo’s attorney did not research the deadline for filing Lombardo’s petition for postconviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Instead, he delegated that important and complex task to an unsupervised non-lawyer, and relied uncritically on that non-lawyer’s flawed analysis. As a result, the attorney untimely filed Lombardo’s petition, denying Lombardo his first and likely last chance to raise an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim. Did the Seventh Circuit err in holding that such misconduct can never constitute an “extraordinary circumstance” for equitable-tolling purposes?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nicole C. Henning
Jones Day
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Linked docket
17A467
Order
Order list, February 20, 2018 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Feb 20 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jan 31 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.
- Jan 24 2018Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jan 12 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2018)
- Oct 27 2017Application (17A467) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 19, 2018.
- Oct 25 2017Application (17A467) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 5, 2017 to January 19, 2018, submitted to Justice Kagan.