Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Etihad Airways P.J.S.C. v. Jane Doe, et vir
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 16-1042 · judgment August 30, 2017
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Sixth Circuit decision below.
Question presented
Whether Article 17(1) of the Montreal Convention allows recovery for mental or psychic injuries as “damage sustained,” where an “accident” causes a “bodily injury” but the mental or psychic injuries are not caused by or do not flow from the “bodily injury”?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew J. Harakas
Clyde & CO US LLP
For respondent
Mark Kelley Schwartz
Driggers, Schultz & Herbst
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Apr 16 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.
- Mar 12 2018Brief of respondents Jane Doe and John Doe in opposition filed.
- Feb 08 2018Brief amicus curiae of International Air Transport Association filed.
- Feb 06 2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Etihad Airways P.J.S.C..
- Jan 29 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 12, 2018.
- Jan 25 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2018 to March 12, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 22 2018Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Jane Doe and John Doe.
- Jan 22 2018Motion of Jane Doe and John Doe for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (January 23, 2018)
- Jan 04 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2018)