Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William Breck v. Raul Hernandez, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Nevada, No. 69163 · judgment April 26, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
QUESTION 1: Whether entry of a Default Judgment on a Complaint that fails to meet the minimum pleading requirements of FRCP Rule 8 (or 9(b), if applicable) is a violation of the ‘Due Process’ clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or beyond the jurisdiction of the Court. QUESTION 2: Whether a State Court’s failure to apply a Rule promulgated as a ‘Mandatory’ Rule of Pleading by the State’s Supreme Court is a violation of the ‘Due Process’ or ‘Equal Protection’ clauses of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. QUESTION 3: Whether the exclusion of a defaulted Defendant from testifying in the ‘damages phase’ of a case before the court, without good cause, is a violation of the ‘Due Process’ or ‘Equal Protection’ clauses of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William H. Breck
William H. Breck, Esq.
For respondent
Roger S. Doyle
Doyle Law Office, PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 20 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jan 31 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.
- Jan 16 2018Waiver of right of respondents Raul Hernandez, et al. to respond filed.
- Dec 20 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2018)