Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Brown, Warden v. Dentrell Brown
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 16-1014 · judgment February 1, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under the Martinez-Trevino doctrine, a procedural default will not bar a federal habeas court from hearing a substantial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel if a state denies a meaningful opportunity to raise the claim on direct appeal. Indiana allows trial-counsel Strickland claims on direct appeal in one of two ways. First, if they choose to make no further record in support of their claims, defendants may simply assert them in their brief on appeal. Second, if they wish to develop a record supporting their claims, defendants may suspend their direct appeals while they develop the factual record in trial court in what is called the Davis/Hatton procedure. Any appeal of that claim will be combined with the direct appeal of the conviction. The Davis/Hatton procedure is optional, however, and prisoners may choose instead to raise their trial-counsel Strickland claims in a traditional post-conviction review proceeding after direct appeal. The question presented is whether the Indiana procedure satisfies Martinez-Trevino.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Thomas M. Fisher
EdChoice, Inc.
For respondent
Andrew John Pincus
Mayer Brown LLP
Proceedings
- Apr 16 2018Petition DENIED.
- Apr 09 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.
- Mar 26 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018.
- Mar 07 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.
- Mar 07 2018Reply of petitioner Richard Brown, Warden, Wabash Valley Correctional Facility filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 21 2018Brief of respondent Dentrell Brown in opposition filed.
- Jan 22 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2018
- Jan 17 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2018 to February 21, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 18 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2018)
- Oct 10 2017Application (17A386) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 16, 2017.
- Oct 05 2017Application (17A386) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 17, 2017 to December 16, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan.