Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
First Agency, Inc., et al. v. Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health and Welfare Fund, etc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, No. 16-1846, 16-3319, 16-3375 · judgment August 3, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
In this insurance coverage dispute, did the Eighth Circuit mistakenly apply this Court’s clear direction for interpreting Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA, and specifically this Court’s recent decision in Montanile v. Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), when it held that Plaintiff ’s standard request for declaratory relief sought “equitable relief ” under Section 502(a)(3)?
-
Did the Eighth Circuit err when it affirmed the lower court’s interpretation of the two insuring documents based on outdated ERISA cases involving “federal common law”?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jonathan B. Frank
Maddin Hauser
For respondent
Bryan James Morben
Kutak Rock, LLP
Proceedings
- Mar 19 2018Petition DENIED.
- Feb 21 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.
- Jan 16 2018Brief of respondent Dakotas and Western Minnesota Electrical Industry Health & Welfare Fund in opposition filed.
- Dec 13 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2018)