Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

The Hertz Corporation, et al. v. Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, et al.

Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, No. A151433 · judgment June 22, 2017

Certiorari denied · April 30, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Whether a class action seeking statutory damages for alleged procedural violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681x, can proceed in state court where plaintiffs did not suffer any concrete, real-world injury-in-fact. (i)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert A. Dolinko
Nixon Peabody LLP

For respondent
Eleanor Michelle Drake
Berger & Montague, P.C.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Apr 30 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 11 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.
  3. Apr 10 2018
    Reply of petitioners The Hertz Corporation, et al. filed.
  4. Mar 27 2018
    Brief of respondents Peter Lee & Latonya Campbell in opposition filed.
  5. Feb 20 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 4, 2018.
  6. Feb 15 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 5, 2018 to April 4, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Feb 02 2018
    Response Requested. (Due March 5, 2018)
  8. Jan 31 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.
  9. Jan 04 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent Peter Lee & Latonya Campbell to respond filed.
  10. Dec 12 2017
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2018)