Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Keshaun D. Earley, aka Keshawn Earley, aka Keshawn Early, aka Buddha Earley v. New Jersey

Paid petition · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-5051-13T1 · judgment March 17, 2017


Certiorari denied · January 22, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

In Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), and Illinois v. Fisher, 540 U.S. 544 (2004), this Court held that the police violate a defendant’s due process rights when they destroy potentially exculpatory evidence in bad faith. This Court, though, did not define what constitutes “bad faith” under this standard. Since Youngblood and Fisher, state courts and federal circuit courts have divided on what a defendant must prove to satisfy the bad faith standard, with some requiring malicious intent, others requiring only knowledge of the evidence’s potential exculpatory value, and still others requiring recklessness, gross negligence, or other severe misconduct. The question presented is: Whether the police acted in bad faith and thus violated Petitioner’s due process rights where the trial court found that (1) the police knowingly destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence as part of a pattern of “cavalier” disregard for the State’s obligation to preserve such evidence, and (2) the absence of the destroyed evidence was prejudicial to Petitioner’s ability to present his alibi? 

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Elizabeth Cheryl Jarit
New Jersey Office of the Public Defender

For respondent
John J. Santoliquido
Atlantic County Prosecutor's Office

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 22 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 03 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2018.
  3. Dec 11 2017
    Waiver of right of respondent The State of New Jersey to respond filed.
  4. Dec 05 2017
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2018)